An Argument for the Existence of God from a Copenhagen Interpretation of Quantum Physics

Disclaimers: - I learned my quantum physics mostly from a YouTube video, a science guy's blog, and from skimming Wikipedia. 🤔 I have not taken any academic classes on this topic, I can't make heads or tails of the math behind it, and my sources aren't exactly what you would consider the most reliable. It's quite possible that there's gaping holes in this argument due to a flawed understanding of quantum physics on my part. - This argument relies on what I believe is a Copenhagen interpretation of quantum physics; as such, I do not take into consideration the possibility of a multiverse, and any discussion of a multiverse is considered to be beyond the scope of this argument. (In other words, yes, I know you can probably shatter this argument with a many-worlds interpretation of quantum physics, please don't. 🙃) - I *think* this is OC, but this seems like an argument that someone would have thought of way before me, so if this is one of those "debated to death" topics, I apologize in advance, feel free to let me know and send me to go do something else. - I don't hold to this argument firmly. This is just an idea that I wanted to bounce off y'all and see if we can sharpen each other like iron (**Proverbs 27:17**). Alright, now that I've sucked the wind out of this ship's sails, let's see how far it goes. --- According to my current understanding of the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum physics (which I'll abbreviate as QP from now on), a subatomic particle exists in a superposition if it hasn't been observed. It may be in two states at once, or it may be moving in two directions at once, etc. Once an observer of some sort measures the state of a particle, it "snaps" fully into one position (e.g., definitely moving forward, not off to the side). In the absence of an initial observer, all particles on earth would be in superpositions at all times, since there would be no observers. There would be no problem with the particles in my brain simultaneously being part of Betelgeuse's core, since no one would be there to see where the particles really were. The entire universe would basically be a sea of probabilities with no definite "this particle is -->here<--" anywhere in it. This view doesn't line up with my view of reality. There are particles most certainly making up my computer's power button - I know, I can see and feel the affects they're having on my senses. They are not in superpositions, they are right -->here<--. I'm equally certain that there's properly functioning particles in my system's CPU, since my typing is generating legible words on my screen. I'm indirectly observing their existence. This contradicts a world with no initial observer. In order for there to ever be a physical observer of any kind, something needs to have observed that observer first, to eliminate the superposition problem. Thus, we end up with an infinite regress problem (if I was observed by someone or something, who or what observed them, and so on and so forth into eternity past). In order to make sense of reality, the regress must be terminated. And in order to terminate the regress, we need something that fulfills all of the following points: - It must be a conscious observer. - It must be able to exist without a prior observer (thus transcending the laws of QP). - It must be able to interact with a universe wherein which QP is in effect, in order to observe the particles within that universe. Since our world obviously contains particles in definite positions, we can therefore conclude that this "prime transcendent observer" exists. I think it's apparent that this observer is in a suspiciously good position to be God, given its properties.